Erik Gustavsson

Publication Activity (10 Years)

Years Active: 2018-2023
Publications (10 Years): 9

Top Topics

Artificial Intelligence

Breast Cancer Risk

Urinary Incontinence

Top Venues

Journal of medical ethics

BMC medical ethics

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy

This page only lists publications with an associated author ORCID identifier.

Publications

Borgar Jølstad, Erik Gustavsson
Against tiebreaking arguments in priority setting. Journal of medical ethics (2023)
Erik Gustavsson, Lars Lindblom
Justification of principles for healthcare priority setting: the relevance and roles of empirical studies exploring public values. Journal of medical ethics (2023)
Erik Gustavsson, Niklas Juth, Gerd Lärfars, Pauline Raaschou, Lars Sandman
Should relational effects be considered in health care priority setting? Bioethics (2023)
Erik Gustavsson, Pauline Raaschou, Gerd Lärfars, Lars Sandman, Niklas Juth
The ethics of disease-modifying drugs targeting Alzheimer disease: response to our commentators. Journal of medical ethics 48 (3) (2022)
Erik Gustavsson, Pauline Raaschou, Gerd Lärfars, Lars Sandman, Niklas Juth
Novel drug candidates targeting Alzheimer's disease: ethical challenges with identifying the relevant patient population. Journal of medical ethics 47 (9) (2021)
Niklas Juth, Martin Henriksson, Erik Gustavsson, Lars Sandman
Should we accept a higher cost per health improvement for orphan drugs? A review and analysis of egalitarian arguments. Bioethics 35 (4) (2020)
Mathias Barra, Mari Broqvist, Erik Gustavsson, Martin Henriksson, Niklas Juth, Lars Sandman, Carl Tollef Solberg
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda. Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy 28 (1) (2020)
Erik Gustavsson, Giovanni Galvis, Niklas Juth
Genetic testing for breast cancer risk, from BRCA1/2 to a seven gene panel: an ethical analysis. BMC medical ethics 21 (1) (2020)
Erik Gustavsson
Patients with multiple needs for healthcare and priority to the worse off. Bioethics 33 (2) (2018)