Login / Signup

Using quantitative sensory testing to predict attrition in an interdisciplinary pain management program: a pilot study.

Jason A ZafereoBrittany UhlenbrockSeth WatsonSharon S Wang-PriceCarl NoeRobin B JarrettKaren J MeltzerMu Huang
Published in: Pain management (2022)
Aim: To determine the extent to which quantitative sensory testing (QST) predicted attrition in an interdisciplinary pain program (IPP). Patients & methods: Participants (n = 53) enrolled in an IPP completed pretreatment assessments of QST and the PROMIS-29 quality of life survey. Results & conclusion: Compared with completers, non-completers (24.5%) reported significantly higher pain intensity (7.1, 95% CI [5.8, 8.4] versus 5.4, 95% CI [4.8, 6.1]) and cold hyperalgesia (14.6°C, 95% CI [8.8, 20.4] versus 7.5°C, 95% CI [4.8, 6.1]), with both variables also predicting attrition. This finding highlights a potentially novel and clinically significant use of QST. Higher overall pain intensity and the presence of remote cold hyperalgesia may identify patients at risk for dropping out of an IPP.
Keyphrases
  • pain management
  • chronic pain
  • neuropathic pain
  • end stage renal disease
  • ejection fraction
  • newly diagnosed
  • prognostic factors
  • high resolution
  • peritoneal dialysis
  • quality improvement
  • high intensity
  • spinal cord