Login / Signup

Intravenous versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography: Occlusion rate and complication assessment of experimental aneurysms after flow diverter treatment in rabbits.

Andreas SimgenToshiki TomoriHagen BombergUmut YilmazChristian RothWolfgang ReithRuben Mühl-Bennighaus
Published in: Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences (2018)
Intravenous digital subtraction angiography can not give a sufficient statement on the aneurysm occlusion process compared to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and is therefore not recommended for imaging follow-up after flow diverter treatment in rabbits. Regarding untreated aneurysms and complications like device occlusions, in-stent stenosis and post-stent stenosis intravenous digital subtraction angiography proofed to be a good alternative to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography in our study.
Keyphrases
  • optical coherence tomography
  • computed tomography
  • dual energy
  • high dose
  • internal carotid artery
  • coronary artery
  • high resolution
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • risk factors
  • mass spectrometry