Completeness of reporting for systematic reviews of point-of-care ultrasound: a meta-research study.
Ross PragerMichael PratteAndrew GuySudarshan BalaRoudi BacharDaniel J KimScott MillingtonJean-Paul SalamehTrevor A McGrathMatthew Df McInnesPublished in: BMJ evidence-based medicine (2021)
Overall, the reporting of POCUS diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews and meta-analyses was moderate. We identified deficits in several key areas including the preregistration of systematic reviews in an online repository, handling of multiple definitions of target conditions, index tests and reference standards and specifying minimally acceptable test accuracy. Prospective registration of reviews and detailed reporting as per PRISMA-DTA during the research process could improve reporting completeness. At an editorial level, word count and supplemental material limitations may impede reporting completeness, whereas endorsement of reporting guidelines on journal websites could improve reporting.