Multivendor comparison of global and regional 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking strains vs tissue tagging at 3T.
Sebastian MilitaruRoman PanovskyVincent HanetMihaela Silvia AmzulescuHélène LangetMary Mojica PisciottiAnne-Catherine PouleurJean-Louis J VanoverscheldeBernhard L GerberPublished in: Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (2021)
We confirm good agreement of CMR FT and little intervendor difference for GLS and GCS evaluation, with variable agreement for GRS. For regional strain evaluation, intervendor difference was larger, especially for RS, and the diagnostic performance varied more substantially among different vendors for regional strain analysis.