Login / Signup

Comparing the Expense and Accuracy of Methods to Simulate Atomic Vibrations in Rubrene.

Makena A DettmannLucas S R CavalcanteCorina MagdalenoKarina MasalkovaitėDaniel VongJordan T DullBarry P RandLuke L DaemenNir GoldmanSung Oh ChoAdam J Moulé
Published in: Journal of chemical theory and computation (2021)
Atomic vibrations can inform about materials properties from hole transport in organic semiconductors to correlated disorder in metal-organic frameworks. Currently, there are several methods for predicting these vibrations using simulations, but the accuracy-efficiency tradeoffs have not been examined in depth. In this study, rubrene is used as a model system to predict atomic vibrational properties using six different simulation methods: density functional theory, density functional tight binding, density functional tight binding with a Chebyshev polynomial-based correction, a trained machine learning model, a pretrained machine learning model called ANI-1, and a classical forcefield model. The accuracy of each method is evaluated by comparison to the experimental inelastic neutron scattering spectrum. All methods discussed here show some accuracy across a wide energy region, though the Chebyshev-corrected tight-binding method showed the optimal combination of high accuracy with low expense. We then offer broad simulation guidelines to yield efficient, accurate results for inelastic neutron scattering spectrum prediction.
Keyphrases
  • machine learning
  • density functional theory
  • blood brain barrier
  • metal organic framework
  • artificial intelligence
  • binding protein
  • big data
  • deep learning
  • high resolution
  • optical coherence tomography
  • monte carlo