Time-based reperfusion in hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism patients: Does early reperfusion therapy improve survival?
Marco ZuinGregory PiazzaAlexandru GrigoreanBehnood BikdeliLukas HobohmGeorge GiannakoulasStavros KonstantinidesPublished in: European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care (2023)
High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Systemic thrombolysis (ST) remains the most evidenced-based treatment for hemodynamically unstable PE but, in daily clinical practice, it remains largely underused. In addition, unlike acute myocardial infarction or stroke, a clear time window for reperfusion therapy, including fibrinolysis, for high-risk PE has not been defined either for fibrinolysis, or for the more recently incorporated options of catheter-based thrombolysis or thrombectomy. The aim of the present article is to review the current evidence supporting the potential benefit of earlier administration of reperfusion in hemodynamically unstable PE patients and suggest some potential strategies to further explore this issue.
Keyphrases
- pulmonary embolism
- acute myocardial infarction
- acute ischemic stroke
- inferior vena cava
- end stage renal disease
- cerebral ischemia
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- left ventricular
- atrial fibrillation
- physical activity
- patient reported outcomes
- coronary artery disease
- mesenchymal stem cells
- bone marrow
- stem cells
- risk assessment
- acute coronary syndrome
- replacement therapy