Login / Signup

Collateral Status at Single-Phase and Multiphase CT Angiography versus CT Perfusion for Outcome Prediction in Anterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Zhi WangJian XieTian-Yu TangChu Hui ZengYi ZhangZhen ZhaoDeng-Ling ZhaoLei-Yu GengGang DengZhi-Jun ZhangSheng-Hong JuGao-Jun Teng
Published in: Radiology (2020)
Background Collateral status assessed with single- or multiphase CT angiography can be used to predict outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, little is known about whether these measures could be comparable with CT perfusion parameters. Purpose To compare the predictive ability of collateral score systems assessed with single- or multiphase CT angiography and CT perfusion parameters in determining clinical outcomes in patients with AIS. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, data obtained from October 2017 to August 2018 in consecutive patients with AIS caused by isolated anterior circulation large artery occlusion and that were obtained within 24 hours after onset were reviewed. The collateral score was assessed by using established scoring systems described by Menon et al. The correlations between single- and multiphase collateral scores, hypoperfusion, and ischemic core volume and final infarct volume (FIV) determined by follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging or unenhanced CT were studied. Receiver operating characteristic curves and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the predictive ability of scoring systems and CT perfusion parameters for a favorable clinical outcome. Results A total of 119 patients (median age, 75 years; interquartile range, 66-82 years; 74 men) were included. Both single- and multiphase Menon scores had a moderate negative correlation with FIV (r = -0.43, P < .001; r = -0.44, P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the multiphase Menon score performed better than the single-phase Menon score (area under the curve [AUC], 0.72 vs 0.64; P = .045) in the prediction of a favorable 90-day modified Rankin scale score. There was no difference between multiphase Menon score and hypoperfusion volume (AUC, 0.72 vs 0.72; P = .97) or ischemic core volume (AUC, 0.72 vs 0.71; P = .94). Multivariable analysis showed multiphase Menon score was an independent predictor of good clinical outcomes (odds ratio = 3.04, P = .001). Conclusion Multiphase Menon score performed better than single-phase Menon score and was comparable with CT perfusion parameters in determining clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. © RSNA, 2020.
Keyphrases