Login / Signup

Sensitivity to Peer Evaluation and Its Genetic and Environmental Determinants: Findings from a Population-Based Twin Study.

Annelie Beijer-KlippelUlrich ReininghausWolfgang ViechtbauerJeroen DecosterPhilippe DelespaulCathérine DeromMarc de HertNele JacobsClaudia Menne-LothmannBart RuttenEvert ThieryJim van OsRuud van WinkelInez Myin-GermeysMarieke Wichers
Published in: Child psychiatry and human development (2019)
Adolescents and young adults are highly focused on peer evaluation, but little is known about sources of their differential sensitivity. We examined to what extent sensitivity to peer evaluation is influenced by interacting environmental and genetic factors. A sample of 354 healthy adolescent twin pairs (n = 708) took part in a structured, laboratory task in which they were exposed to peer evaluation. The proportion of the variance in sensitivity to peer evaluation due to genetic and environmental factors was estimated, as was the association with specific a priori environmental risk factors. Differences in sensitivity to peer evaluation between adolescents were explained mainly by non-shared environmental influences. The results on shared environmental influences were not conclusive. No impact of latent genetic factors or gene-environment interactions was found. Adolescents with lower self-rated positions on the social ladder or who reported to have been bullied more severely showed significantly stronger responses to peer evaluation. Not genes, but subjective social status and past experience of being bullied seem to impact sensitivity to peer evaluation. This suggests that altered response to peer evaluation is the outcome of cumulative sensitization to social interactions.
Keyphrases
  • risk factors
  • young adults
  • genome wide
  • healthcare
  • physical activity
  • copy number
  • risk assessment
  • climate change
  • clinical evaluation