Login / Signup

Unsupervised Pattern Analysis to Differentiate Multiple Sclerosis Phenotypes Using Principal Component Analysis on Various MRI Sequences.

Chris W J van der WeijdenMilena S PitombeiraDébora E PerettiKenia R CampanholoGuilherme D KolingerCarolina de Medeiros RimkusCarlos Alberto BuchpiguelRudi A J O DierckxRemco J RenkenJan F MeilofErik F J de VriesDaniele de Paula Faria
Published in: Journal of clinical medicine (2024)
Background : Multiple sclerosis (MS) has two main phenotypes: relapse-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS (PMS), distinguished by disability profiles and treatment response. Differentiating them using conventional MRI is challenging. Objective : This study explores the use of scaled subprofile modelling using principal component analysis (SSM/PCA) on MRI data to distinguish between MS phenotypes. Methods : MRI scans were performed on patients with RRMS (n = 30) and patients with PMS (n = 20), using the standard sequences T 1 w, T 2 w, T 2 w-FLAIR, and the myelin-sensitive sequences magnetisation transfer (MT) ratio (MTR), quantitative MT (qMT), inhomogeneous MT ratio (ihMTR), and quantitative inhomogeneous MT (qihMT). Results : SSM/PCA analysis of qihMT images best differentiated PMS from RRMS, with the highest specificity (87%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (83%), but a lower sensitivity (67%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (72%). Conversely, T 1 w data analysis showed the highest sensitivity (93%) and NPV (89%), with a lower PPV (67%) and specificity (53%). Phenotype classification agreement between T 1 w and qihMT was observed in 57% of patients. In the subset with concordant classifications, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100%, 88%, 90%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions : SSM/PCA on MRI data revealed distinctive patterns for MS phenotypes. Optimal discrimination occurred with qihMT and T 1 w sequences, with qihMT identifying PMS and T 1 w identifying RRMS. When qihMT and T 1 w analyses align, MS phenotype prediction improves.
Keyphrases