Utilization of Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display for the Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Spinal Trauma.
Michael Ryan KannMiguel A Ruiz-CardozoSamuel BrehmTim BuiKaran JosephKarma BarotGabriel TrevinoAbigail Carey-EwendSom P SinghMatthew De La PazAhmed HanafyMichael OlufawoRujvee P PatelAlexander T YahandaAlexander Perdomo-PantojaJulio J JaureguiMagalie CadieuxBrenton H PennicookeCamilo A MolinaPublished in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2024)
Background and Objectives : Augmented reality head-mounted display (AR-HMD) is a novel technology that provides surgeons with a real-time CT-guided 3-dimensional recapitulation of a patient's spinal anatomy. In this case series, we explore the use of AR-HMD alongside more traditional robotic assistance in surgical spine trauma cases to determine their effect on operative costs and perioperative outcomes. Materials and Methods : We retrospectively reviewed trauma patients who underwent pedicle screw placement surgery guided by AR-HMD or robotic-assisted platforms at an academic tertiary care center between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022. Outcome distributions were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results : The AR cohort (n = 9) had a mean age of 66 years, BMI of 29.4 kg/m 2 , Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 4.1, and Surgical Invasiveness Index (SII) of 8.8. In total, 77 pedicle screws were placed in this cohort. Intra-operatively, there was a mean blood loss of 378 mL, 0.78 units transfused, 398 min spent in the operating room, and a 20-day LOS. The robotic cohort (n = 13) had a mean age of 56 years, BMI of 27.1 kg/m 2 , CCI of 3.8, and SII of 14.2. In total, 128 pedicle screws were placed in this cohort. Intra-operatively, there was a mean blood loss of 432 mL, 0.46 units transfused units used, 331 min spent in the operating room, and a 10.4-day LOS. No significant difference was found between the two cohorts in any outcome metrics. Conclusions : Although the need to address urgent spinal conditions poses a significant challenge to the implementation of innovative technologies in spine surgery, this study represents an initial effort to show that AR-HMD can yield comparable outcomes to traditional robotic surgical techniques. Moreover, it highlights the potential for AR-HMD to be readily integrated into Level 1 trauma centers without requiring extensive modifications or adjustments.
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- trauma patients
- robot assisted
- spinal cord
- neuropathic pain
- tertiary care
- body mass index
- computed tomography
- healthcare
- primary care
- virtual reality
- quality improvement
- cardiac surgery
- patients undergoing
- magnetic resonance
- red blood cell
- optic nerve
- type diabetes
- weight gain
- ultrasound guided
- coronary artery disease
- risk assessment
- acute kidney injury
- climate change
- insulin resistance
- spinal cord injury
- acute coronary syndrome
- contrast enhanced
- human health
- weight loss
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- glycemic control
- atrial fibrillation
- optical coherence tomography
- positron emission tomography