A transdiagnostic meta-analysis of acute augmentations to psychological therapy.
Camilla L NordBeth LongleyQuentin DerconVeronica PhillipsJulia FunkSiobhan GormleyRachel KnightAlicia J SmithTim DalgleishPublished in: Nature mental health (2023)
At least half of all patients with mental health disorders do not respond adequately to psychological therapy. Acutely enhancing particular biological or psychological processes during psychological therapy may improve treatment outcomes. However, previous studies are confined to specific augmentation approaches, typically assessed within single diagnostic categories. Our objective was to assess to what degree acute augmentations of psychological therapy reduce psychiatric symptoms and estimate effect sizes of augmentation types (for example, brain stimulation or psychedelics). We searched Medline, PsycINFO and Embase for controlled studies published between database inception and 25 May 2022. We conducted a preregistered random-effects meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42021236403). We identified 108 studies ( N = 5,889). Acute augmentation significantly reduced the severity of mental health problems (Hedges' g = -0.27, 95% CI: [-0.36, -0.18]; P < 0.0001), particularly for the transdiagnostic dimensions 'Fear' and 'Distress'. This result survived a trim-and-fill analysis to account for publication bias. Subgroup analyses revealed that pharmacological, psychological and somatic augmentations were effective, but to varying degrees. Acute augmentation approaches are a promising route to improve outcomes from psychological therapy.
Keyphrases
- mental health
- liver failure
- systematic review
- respiratory failure
- drug induced
- case control
- gene expression
- intensive care unit
- depressive symptoms
- bone marrow
- mental illness
- meta analyses
- white matter
- dna methylation
- smoking cessation
- brain injury
- physical activity
- genome wide
- data analysis
- adverse drug
- mechanical ventilation
- chemotherapy induced