Login / Signup

Aromatic fluorocopolymers based on α-(difluoromethyl)styrene and styrene: synthesis, characterization, and thermal and surface properties.

Joanna WolskaJustyna Walkowiak-KulikowskaAnna SzwajcaHenryk KoroniakBruno M Ameduri
Published in: RSC advances (2018)
A study on the α-(difluoromethyl)styrene (DFMST) reactivity under conventional radical copolymerization conditions is presented. Although the homopolymerization of DFMST failed, its radical bulk copolymerization with styrene (ST) led to the synthesis of fluorinated aromatic polymers (FAPs). The resulting novel poly(DFMST- co -ST) copolymers were characterized by 1 H, 19 F and 13 C NMR spectroscopies that evidenced the successful incorporation of DFMST units into copolymers and enabled the assessment of their respective molar percentages (10.4-48.2 mol%). The molar masses were in the range of 1900-17 200 g mol -1 . The bulkier CF 2 H group in the α-position induced the lower reactivity of the DFMST comonomer. ST and DFMST monomer reactivity ratios ( r DFMST = 0.0 and r ST = 0.70 ± 0.05 at 70 °C) were determined based on linear least-square methods. These values indicate that DFMST monomer is less reactive than ST, retards the polymerization rate, and thus reduces the molar masses. Moreover, the thermal properties ( T g , T d ) of the resulting copolymers indicate that the presence of DFMST units incorporated into poly(ST) structure promotes an increase of the T g values up to 109 °C and a slightly better thermal stability than that of poly(ST). Additionally, the thermal decomposition of poly(DFMST- co -ST) copolymer (10.4/89.6) was assessed by simultaneous thermal analysis coupled with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectrometry showing that H 2 O, CO 2 , CO and styrene were released. The surface analysis was focused on the effects of the -CF 2 H group at the α-position of styrene comonomers on surface free energy of the copolymer films. Water and diiodomethane contact angle (CA) measurements confirmed that these copolymers ( M n = 2300-17 200 g mol -1 ) are not exactly the same as polystyrenes ( M n = 2100-21 600 g mol -1 ) in the solid state. The CA hysteresis for poly(ST) (6-8°) and poly(DFMST- co -ST) copolymers (3-5°) reflected these differences even more accurately.
Keyphrases
  • magnetic resonance
  • high resolution
  • computed tomography
  • oxidative stress
  • amino acid
  • endothelial cells
  • ms ms
  • contrast enhanced
  • contrast enhanced ultrasound