Login / Signup

Impact of second-degree related donor on the outcomes of T cell-replete haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

Jacopo MariottiAnna Maria RaiolaAndrea EvangelistaSamia HarbiFrancesca PatriarcaMichele Angelo CarellaMassimo MartinoAntonio RisitanoAlessandro BuscaLuisa GiacconeLucia BrunelloEmanuela MerlaLucia SavinoBarbara LotetaGiuseppe ConsoleRenato FaninAlessandra SperottoLuana MaranoSerena MarottaCamilla FrieriSimona SicaPatrizia ChiusoloChristian ChabanonSabine FurstArmando SantoroAndrea BacigalupoBenedetto BrunoDidier BlaiseDomenico MavilioStefania BramantiRaynier DevillierEmanuele AngelucciLuca Castagna
Published in: Bone marrow transplantation (2022)
Donor selection may contribute to improve clinical outcomes of T cell-replete haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). Impact of second-degree related donor (SRD) was not fully elucidated in this platform. We retrospectively compared the outcome of patients receiving Haplo-SCT either from a SRD (n = 31) or a first-degree related donor (FRD, n = 957). Median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery did not differ between a SRD and a FRD transplant (p = 0.599 and 0.587). Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus host disease (GVHD) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD was 13% and 19% after SRD vs 24% (p = 0.126) and 13% (p = 0.395) after FRD transplant. One-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19% for SRD and 20% for FRD (p = 0.435) cohort. The 3-year probability of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 42% vs 55% (p = 0.273) and 49% vs 35% (p = 0.280) after SRD and FRD transplant, respectively. After propensity score adjustment or matched pair analysis, the outcome of patients receiving Haplo-SCT from a SRD or a FRD did not differ in terms of NRM, OS, PFS, acute and chronic GVHD. Our results suggest that a SRD is a viable option for Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy when a FRD is not available.
Keyphrases