Login / Signup

A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.

Jin Ho ParkGyulee ParkHa Yeon KimJi-Yeong LeeYeajin HamDonghwan HwangSuncheol KwonJoon-Ho Shin
Published in: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2020)
There were no differences between the two groups regarding the impairment and activity domains. However, the PSV robots were more beneficial than ACT robots regarding participation and smoothness. Considering the high cost and complexity of ACT robots, PSV robots might be more suitable for rehabilitation in stroke survivors capable of voluntary movement. Trial registration The trial was registered retrospectively on 14 March 2018 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03465267).
Keyphrases
  • study protocol
  • atrial fibrillation
  • phase iii
  • clinical trial
  • phase ii
  • physical activity
  • young adults
  • electronic health record
  • open label
  • health information
  • brain injury