Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting in 5-Year Quality-of-Life Comparison among Three Surgical Procedures for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Der-Ming ChangYu-Fu ChenHong-Yaw ChenSi-Un Frank ChiuKing-Teh LeeJhi-Joung WangDing-Ping SunHao-Hsien LeeYu-Tsz ShiuI-Te ChenHon-Yi ShiPublished in: Cancers (2022)
This prospective longitudinal cohort study analyzed long-term changes in individual subscales of quality-of-life (QOL) measures and explored whether these changes were related to effective QOL predictors after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surgery. All 520 HCC patients in this study had completed QOL surveys before surgery and at 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery. Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare the 5-year QOL among the three HCC surgical procedures. The QOL was significantly ( p < 0.05) improved at 6 months after HCC surgery but plateaued at 2-5 years after surgery. In postoperative surveys, the effect size was largest in the nausea and vomiting subscales in patients who had received robotic surgery, and the effect size was smallest in the dyspnea subscale in patients who had received open surgery. It revealed the following explanatory variables for postoperative QOL: surgical procedure type, gender, age, hepatitis C, smoking, tumor stage, postoperative recurrence, and preoperative QOL. The comparisons revealed that, when evaluating QOL after HCC surgery, several factors other than the surgery itself should be considered. The analysis results also implied that postoperative quality of life might depend not only on the success of the surgical procedure, but also on preoperative quality of life.
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- coronary artery bypass
- patients undergoing
- surgical site infection
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- single cell
- coronary artery disease
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- mental health
- acute coronary syndrome
- prognostic factors
- smoking cessation
- combination therapy
- replacement therapy