Login / Signup

Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM.

Nyssa J SilbigerAmber D Stubler
Published in: PeerJ (2019)
Studies show that a negative perception of aptitude leads to lowered self-confidence, short-term disruptions in success and productivity and delays in career advancement. Therefore, our results indicate that unprofessional reviews likely have and will continue to perpetuate the gap in STEM fields for traditionally underrepresented groups in the sciences.
Keyphrases
  • climate change
  • meta analyses
  • case control