Login / Signup

Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer-review.

Marta VilaróJordi CortésAlbert Selva-O'CallaghanAgustín UrrutiaJosep-Maria RiberaFrancesc CardellachXavier BasagañaMatthew ElmoreMiquel VilardellDouglas AltmanJosé-Antonio GonzálezErik Cobo
Published in: BMC medical research methodology (2019)
We interpret that those effects are driven mainly by introducing into the editorial process a senior methodologist to find missing RG items. Those results are promising, but not definitive due to the exploratory nature of the study and some important caveats such as: the limitations of using the number of citations as a measure of scientific impact; and the fact that our study is based on a single journal. We invite journals to perform their own studies to ascertain whether or not scientific repercussion is increased by adhering to reporting guidelines and further involving statisticians in the editorial process.
Keyphrases
  • clinical practice
  • squamous cell carcinoma
  • systematic review
  • weight loss