A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Nannan LiAnnelies BoonenJoop P W van den BerghJustin G L M LuermansCaroline E WyersMarsha M van OostwaardLisanne VrankenSandrine P G BoursMickaël J C HiligsmannPublished in: Journal of medical economics (2022)
Both EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D appeared to be valid utility instruments in patients with fractures attending the FLS. However, they cannot be used interchangeably given only moderate agreement was identified, and differences in utilities and ceiling effect were revealed. Comparable construct validity and responsiveness were indicated, and neither instrument was found to be clearly superior.