Login / Signup

Divergent landscapes of A-to-I editing in postmortem and living human brain.

Miguel Rodriguez de Los SantosBrian H KopellAriela Buxbaum GriceGauri GaneshAndy YangPardis AminiLora E LiharskaEric VornholtJohn F FullardPengfei DongEric ParkSarah ZipkowitzDeepak A KajiRyan C ThompsonDonjing LiuYou Jeong ParkEsther ChengKimia ZiafatEmily MoyaBrian FennessyLillian WilkinsHannah SilkLisa M LinaresBrendan SullivanVanessa CohenPrashant KotaClaudia FengJessica S JohnsonMarysia-Kolbe RiederJoseph ScarpaGirish N NadkarniMinghui WangBin ZhangPamela SklarNoam D BeckmannEric E SchadtPanos RoussosAlexander W CharneyMichael S Breen
Published in: medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences (2024)
Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing is a prevalent post-transcriptional RNA modification within the brain. Yet, most research has relied on postmortem samples, assuming it is an accurate representation of RNA biology in the living brain. We challenge this assumption by comparing A-to-I editing between postmortem and living prefrontal cortical tissues. Major differences were found, with over 70,000 A-to-I sites showing higher editing levels in postmortem tissues. Increased A-to-I editing in postmortem tissues is linked to higher ADAR1 and ADARB1 expression, is more pronounced in non-neuronal cells, and indicative of postmortem activation of inflammation and hypoxia. Higher A-to-I editing in living tissues marks sites that are evolutionarily preserved, synaptic, developmentally timed, and disrupted in neurological conditions. Common genetic variants were also found to differentially affect A-to-I editing levels in living versus postmortem tissues. Collectively, these discoveries illuminate the nuanced functions and intricate regulatory mechanisms of RNA editing within the human brain.
Keyphrases