Unwarranted variation in radiation therapy fractionation.
Vikneswary BatumalaiMelissa L JamesPublished in: Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology (2022)
The adoption of hypofractionation across multiple tumour sites has been slow despite robust evidence. There is considerable unwarranted variation in practice, both within and between jurisdictions. This has been attributed to inconsistencies in guidelines, physician preference, lack of technology and differing financial incentives. Unwarranted variation in the use of hypofractionation has a tremendous effect on cost to both patients and the healthcare system. This places an unnecessary burden on patients and poorly utilises scarce healthcare resources. A collaborative effort from clinicians, patients, healthcare providers and policymakers is needed to reduce unwarranted variation in practice. This will improve quality of care both for patients and at broader healthcare system level.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- radiation therapy
- chronic kidney disease
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- squamous cell carcinoma
- risk factors
- patient reported outcomes
- human immunodeficiency virus
- electronic health record
- clinical practice
- health insurance
- radiation induced
- childhood cancer