Login / Signup

It is time to abandon single-value oxygen uptake energy equivalents.

Pavreet K GillShalaya KippOwen N BeckRodger Kram
Published in: Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) (2023)
Physiologists commonly use single-value energy equivalents (e.g., 20.1 kJ/LO 2 and 20.9 kJ/LO 2 ) to convert oxygen uptake (V̇o 2 ) to energy, but doing so ignores how the substrate oxidation ratio (carbohydrate:fat) changes across aerobic intensities. Using either 20.1 kJ/LO 2 or 20.9 kJ/LO 2 can incur systematic errors of up to 7%. In most circumstances, the best approach for estimating energy expenditure is to measure both V̇o 2 and V̇co 2 and use accurate, species-appropriate stoichiometry. However, there are circumstances when V̇co 2 measurements may be unreliable. In those circumstances, we recommend that the research report or compare only V̇o 2 . NEW & NOTEWORTHY We quantify that the common practice of using single-value oxygen uptake energy equivalents for exercising subjects can incur systematic errors of up to 7%. We argue that such errors can be greatly reduced if researchers measure both V̇o 2 and V̇co 2 and adopt appropriate stoichiometry equations.
Keyphrases
  • patient safety
  • adverse drug
  • primary care
  • healthcare
  • adipose tissue
  • high resolution
  • emergency department
  • hydrogen peroxide
  • high intensity
  • drug induced
  • electronic health record