Login / Signup

Use of photodynamic therapy and photobiomodulation as alternatives for microbial control on clinical and subclinical mastitis in sheep.

Lara Oliveira SilvaKedma Lorena da Silva SouzaLarissa de Jesus BelotiWaldemar Mota Ramos NetoSilvia Cristina NúñezDanila Fernanda Rodrigues Frias
Published in: Lasers in medical science (2022)
Evaluate the effects of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) and photobiomodulation (PBM) as alternatives in the treatment of mastitis in sheep. A total of 100 sheep were evaluated, and four teats with clinical mastitis and 16 teats with subclinical mastitis were selected. Milk was collected for isolation and identification of microorganisms. They were grown on TSA, EMB, and MacConkey agar for 24 h, and the microorganisms were identified by Gram stain and biochemical tests. The ceilings were subdivided into four groups: G1, treatment with photosensitizer; G2, treatment with PBM (diode laser λ = 660 nm); G3, aPDT with methylene blue, and G4, control group. Milk samples were collected before, 24 and 48 h after treatments. Cases of subclinical mastitis presented coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Streptococcus spp, and clinical mastitis had Escherichia coli grow from the samples. The treatments decrease the total bacterial count of negative coagulase Staphylococcus, Streptococcus spp, and Escherichia coli. Comparing the treatments, aPDT stood out, as it was able to photoinactivate all bacteria. Treatment with methylene blue photosensitizer, PBM, and aPDT induced the initial microbial reduction, but aPDT was more effective 48 h after treatment.
Keyphrases
  • photodynamic therapy
  • escherichia coli
  • biofilm formation
  • staphylococcus aureus
  • combination therapy
  • pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • oxidative stress
  • high glucose
  • high speed
  • stress induced