Methods to identify and prioritize patient-centered outcomes for use in comparative effectiveness research.
Evan Mayo-WilsonAsieh GolozarTerrie CowleyNicole FuscoGillian GreshamJennifer HaythornthwaiteElizabeth TolbertJennifer L PayneLori RosmanSusan HutflessJoseph K CannerKay DickersinPublished in: Pilot and feasibility studies (2018)
These exploratory results could inform future research about identifying and prioritizing PCOs. We found that stakeholder co-investigators and research reports contributed to identifying PCOs; surveying a patient group contributed to prioritizing PCOs. Prioritizing potential harms was particularly challenging because there are many more potential harms than potential benefits. Methods for identifying and prioritizing potential benefits for CER might not be appropriate for harms. Further research is needed to determine the generalizability of these results.