Login / Signup

Differential abilities to engage inaccessible chromatin diversify vertebrate Hox binding patterns.

Milica BulajićDivyanshi SrivastavaJeremy S DasenHynek WichterleShaun MahonyEsteban Orlando Mazzoni
Published in: Development (Cambridge, England) (2020)
Although Hox genes encode for conserved transcription factors (TFs), they are further divided into anterior, central and posterior groups based on their DNA-binding domain similarity. The posterior Hox group expanded in the deuterostome clade and patterns caudal and distal structures. We aimed to address how similar Hox TFs diverge to induce different positional identities. We studied Hox TF DNA-binding and regulatory activity during an in vitro motor neuron differentiation system that recapitulates embryonic development. We found diversity in the genomic binding profiles of different Hox TFs, even among the posterior group paralogs that share similar DNA-binding domains. These differences in genomic binding were explained by differing abilities to bind to previously inaccessible sites. For example, the posterior group HOXC9 had a greater ability to bind occluded sites than the posterior HOXC10, producing different binding patterns and driving differential gene expression programs. From these results, we propose that the differential abilities of posterior Hox TFs to bind to previously inaccessible chromatin drive patterning diversification.This article has an associated 'The people behind the papers' interview.
Keyphrases
  • dna binding
  • transcription factor
  • gene expression
  • genome wide identification
  • genome wide
  • public health
  • dna damage
  • copy number
  • high resolution
  • minimally invasive
  • binding protein