Login / Signup

A novel diagnostic tool for the evaluation of hypothalamic-pituitary region and diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency: pons ratio.

Meliha DemiralMehmet Salih KaracaEdip UnalBirsen BaysalRıza Taner BaranHüseyin DemirbilekMehmet Nuri Ozbek
Published in: Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM (2020)
Backgrounds Limitations in the evaluation of the pituitary size and changes according to pubertal status make its validity questionable. Recently, in a small-scale study, pons ratio (PR) has been suggested as a more sensitive tool for diagnosis and etiological evaluation of growth hormone deficiency (GHD). The aim of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of PR in the diagnosis of GHD. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 133 patients with a diagnosis of GHD. Primary axis (PA) was assigned as a line crossing the mid-sagittal dorsum sella and fourth ventricle. PR was defined as the pons height above the PA divided by total pons height. The PR of patients with GHD was compared to subjects without GHD. Results Study included 133 patients with GHD and 47 controls. In total, 121 (91%) patients had isolated GHD and 12 (9%) patients had multiple pituitary hormone deficiency. The PR of the patient group (mean: 0.32 ± 0.89; range: 0.14-0.63) was significantly higher than controls (mean: 0.26 ± 0.067; range 0.19-0.44) (p: 0.000). The optimal cut-off value of PR for GHD diagnosis was 0.27 (sensitivity 71% specificity 56%). There was a negative correlation between anterior pituitary height (APH)-SDS and PR (p: 0.002; r: -0.27). APH was increased, but PR remained unchanged in pubertal patients (p: 0.089). Conclusions PR measurement is a noninvasive, practical method with a cost-benefit clinical value. As it is not affected by pubertal status, PR is potentially a more sensitive tool for evaluation of pituitary gland in GHD patients compared to APH.
Keyphrases