Regenerating the field of cardiovascular cell therapy.
Kenneth R ChienJonas FrisénRegina Fritsche-DanielsonDouglas A MeltonCharles E MurryIrving L WeissmanPublished in: Nature biotechnology (2019)
The retraction of >30 falsified studies by Anversa et al. has had a disheartening impact on the cardiac cell therapeutics field. The premise of heart muscle regeneration by the transdifferentiation of bone marrow cells or putative adult resident cardiac progenitors has been largely disproven. Over the past 18 years, a generation of physicians and scientists has lost years chasing these studies, and patients have been placed at risk with little scientific grounding. Funding agencies invested hundreds of millions of dollars in irreproducible work, and both academic institutions and the scientific community ignored troubling signals over a decade of questionable work. Our collective retrospective analysis identifies preventable problems at the level of the editorial and peer-review process, funding agencies and academic institutions. This Perspective provides a chronology of the forces that led to this scientific debacle, integrating direct knowledge of the process. We suggest a science-driven path forward that includes multiple novel approaches to the problem of heart muscle regeneration.
Keyphrases
- cell therapy
- stem cells
- bone marrow
- mesenchymal stem cells
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- mental health
- skeletal muscle
- heart failure
- left ventricular
- primary care
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- induced apoptosis
- public health
- atrial fibrillation
- prognostic factors
- patient safety
- gene expression
- genome wide
- emergency department
- signaling pathway
- young adults
- quality improvement
- cell proliferation