Login / Signup

The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.

Andrija BabicAndela PijukLucie BrázdilováYuliyana GeorgievaMarco António Raposo PereiraTina Poklepovic PericicLivia Puljak
Published in: BMC medical research methodology (2019)
Cochrane authors mention a wide range of sources of other bias in the RoB tool and they inconsistently judge the same supporting explanations. Inconsistency in appraising risk of other bias hinders reliability and comparability of Cochrane systematic reviews. Discrepant and erroneous judgments of bias in evidence synthesis may hinder implementation of evidence in routine clinical practice and reduce confidence in otherwise trustworthy sources of information. These results can help authors of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews to gain insight into various sources of other bias that can be found in trials, and also to help them avoid mistakes that were recognized in published Cochrane reviews.
Keyphrases
  • clinical practice
  • systematic review
  • meta analyses
  • drinking water
  • healthcare
  • physical activity
  • quality improvement