Phase II trial of proton therapy versus photon IMRT for GBM: secondary analysis comparison of progression-free survival between RANO versus clinical assessment.
Karine A Al FeghaliJames W RandallDiane D LiuJeffrey S WefelPaul D BrownDavid R GrosshansSarah A McAvoyMaguy A FarhatJing LiSusan L McGovernMary F McAleerAmol J GhiaArnold C PaulinoErik P SulmanMarta Penas-PradoJihong WangJohn de GrootAmy B HeimbergerTerri S ArmstrongMark R GilbertAnita MahajanNandita Guha-ThakurtaCaroline ChungPublished in: Neuro-oncology advances (2021)
Based on this secondary analysis of a trial of PT versus IMRT for glioblastoma, while no difference in PFS was noted relative to treatment technique, RANO criteria identified progression more often and earlier than clinical assessment. This highlights the disconnect between measures of tumor response in clinical trials versus clinical practice. With growing efforts to utilize real-world data and personalized treatment with timely adaptation, there is a growing need to improve the consistency of determining tumor progression within clinical trials and clinical practice.