Login / Signup

Cost-effectiveness of facility-based, stand-alone and mobile-based voluntary counseling and testing for HIV in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Amanuel YigezuSenait AlemayehuShallo Daba HamusseGetachew Teshome ErgetaDamen HailemariamAlemayehu Hailu
Published in: Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E (2020)
Using a mobile-based VCT approach costs less than both the facility-based and stand-alone approaches, in terms of both unit cost per tested individual and unit cost per HIV seropositive cases identified. The stand-alone VCT approach was not cost-effective compared to facility-based and mobile-based VCT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for mobile-based VCT compared with facility-based VCT was USD 239 per HIV positive case.
Keyphrases
  • hiv positive
  • antiretroviral therapy
  • men who have sex with men
  • hiv testing
  • south africa
  • long term care
  • hiv infected
  • human immunodeficiency virus
  • hiv aids
  • hepatitis c virus