Relative Effects of Radiation-Induced Changes in Bone Mass, Structure, and Tissue Material on Vertebral Strength in a Rat Model.
Shannon R EmerzianTongge WuRachana S VaidyaSimon Y TangRebecca J AbergelTony M KeavenyPublished in: Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (2023)
The observed increased risk of fracture after cancer radiation therapy is presumably due to a radiation-induced reduction in whole-bone strength. However, the mechanisms for impaired strength remain unclear, as the increased fracture risk is not fully explained by changes in bone mass. To provide insight, a small animal model was used to determine how much of this whole bone weakening effect for the spine is due to changes in bone mass, structure, and material properties of the bone tissue and their relative effects. Further, as women have a greater risk of fracture following radiation therapy than men, we investigated if sex had a significant influence on bone's response to irradiation. Fractionated in vivo irradiation (10 x 3 Gy) or sham irradiation (0 Gy) was administered daily to the lumbar spine in twenty-seven 17-week-old Sprague Dawley rats (n = 6-7/sex/group). Twelve weeks following final treatment, animals were euthanized, and lumbar vertebrae (L4 and L5) were isolated. Using a combination of biomechanical testing, micro-CT-based finite element analysis, and statistical regression analysis, we separated out the effect of mass, structural, and tissue material changes on vertebral strength. Compared to the sham group (mean±SD strength = 420±88 N), the mean strength of the irradiated group was lower by 28% (117 N/420 N, p < 0.0001). Overall, the response of treatment did not differ with sex. By combining results from both general linear regression and finite element analyses, we calculated that mean changes in bone mass, structure, and material properties of the bone tissue accounted for 56% (66 N/117 N), 20% (23 N/117 N), and 24% (28 N/117 N), respectively, of the overall change in strength. As such, these results provide insight into why an elevated clinical fracture risk for patients undergoing radiation therapy is not well explained by changes in bone mass alone. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keyphrases
- bone mineral density
- radiation therapy
- radiation induced
- postmenopausal women
- soft tissue
- bone loss
- bone regeneration
- patients undergoing
- body composition
- computed tomography
- small cell lung cancer
- minimally invasive
- physical activity
- replacement therapy
- finite element
- smoking cessation
- high resolution
- positron emission tomography
- gestational age
- young adults
- adipose tissue
- papillary thyroid
- rectal cancer