Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of oliceridine in the treatment of acute pain.
Kit N SimpsonMichael J FosslerLinda WaseMark A DemitrackPublished in: Journal of comparative effectiveness research (2021)
Aim: Oliceridine, a new class of μ-opioid receptor agonist, is selective for G-protein signaling (analgesia) with limited recruitment of β-arrestin (associated with adverse outcomes) and may provide a cost-effective alternative versus conventional opioid morphine for postoperative pain. Patients & methods: Using a decision tree with a 24-h time horizon, we calculated costs for medication and management of three most common adverse events (AEs; oxygen saturation <90%, vomiting and somnolence) following postoperative oliceridine or morphine use. Results: Using oliceridine, the cost for managing AEs was US$528,424 versus $852,429 for morphine, with a net cost savings of $324,005. Conclusion: Oliceridine has a favorable overall impact on the total cost of postoperative care compared with the use of the conventional opioid morphine.
Keyphrases
- pain management
- chronic pain
- postoperative pain
- end stage renal disease
- patients undergoing
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- palliative care
- prognostic factors
- quality improvement
- peritoneal dialysis
- neuropathic pain
- adverse drug
- spinal cord
- patient reported outcomes
- intensive care unit
- hepatitis b virus
- decision making