Subclinical and Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Current Evidence and Unsolved Questions in Clinical Practice.
Andrea BallatoreMario MattaAndrea SagliettoPaolo DesalvoPier Paolo BocchinoFiorenzo GaitaGaetano Maria De FerrariMatteo AnselminoPublished in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2019)
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) may be diagnosed due to symptoms, or it may be found as an incidental electrocardiogram (ECG) finding, or by implanted devices recordings in asymptomatic patients. While anticoagulation, according to individual risk profile, has proven definitely beneficial in terms of prognosis, rhythm control strategies only demonstrated consistent benefits in terms of quality of life. In fact, evidence collected by observational data showed significant benefits in terms of mortality, stroke incidence, and prevention of cognitive impairment for patients referred to AF catheter ablation compared to those medically treated, however randomized trials failed to confirm such results. The aims of this review are to summarize current evidence regarding the treatment specifically of subclinical and asymptomatic AF, to discuss potential benefits of rhythm control therapy, and to highlight unclear areas.
Keyphrases
- atrial fibrillation
- catheter ablation
- left atrial
- oral anticoagulants
- left atrial appendage
- end stage renal disease
- direct oral anticoagulants
- heart failure
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- chronic kidney disease
- clinical practice
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- heart rate
- combination therapy
- physical activity
- coronary artery disease
- risk assessment
- blood pressure
- stem cells
- left ventricular
- cell therapy
- deep learning
- artificial intelligence
- brain injury
- bone marrow
- cerebral ischemia
- replacement therapy