Personalized Interventional Surgery of the Lumbar Spine: A Perspective on Minimally Invasive and Neuroendoscopic Decompression for Spinal Stenosis.
Kai-Uwe LewandrowskiAnthony YeungMorgan P LorioHuilin YangJorge Felipe Ramírez LeónJosé Antonio Soriano SánchezRossano Kepler Alvim FiorelliKang Taek LimJaime MoyanoÁlvaro DowlingJuan Marcelo Sea AramayoJeong-Yoon ParkHyeun-Sung KimJiancheng ZengBin MengFernando Alvarado GómezCarolina RamirezPaulo Sérgio Teixeira De CarvalhoManuel Rodriguez GarciaAlfonso GarciaEulalio Elizalde MartínezIliana Margarita Gómez SilvaJosé Edgardo Valerio PascuaLuis Miguel Duchén RodríguezRobert MevesCristiano M MenezesLuis Eduardo CarelliAlexandre Fogaça CristanteRodrigo AmaralGeraldo de Sa CarneiroHelton DefinoVicky YamamotoBabak Katebnull On Behalf Of Teams/Organizations/InstitutionsPublished in: Journal of personalized medicine (2023)
Pain generator-based lumbar spinal decompression surgery is the backbone of modern spine care. In contrast to traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for spinal surgery, assessing the severity of neural element encroachment, instability, and deformity, staged management of common painful degenerative lumbar spine conditions is likely to be more durable and cost-effective. Targeting validated pain generators can be accomplished with simplified decompression procedures associated with lower perioperative complications and long-term revision rates. In this perspective article, the authors summarize the current concepts of successful management of spinal stenosis patients with modern transforaminal endoscopic and translaminar minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques. They represent the consensus statements of 14 international surgeon societies, who have worked in collaborative teams in an open peer-review model based on a systematic review of the existing literature and grading the strength of its clinical evidence. The authors found that personalized clinical care protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis rooted in validated pain generators can successfully treat most patients with sciatica-type back and leg pain including those who fail to meet traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for surgery since nearly half of the surgically treated pain generators are not shown on the preoperative MRI scan. Common pain generators in the lumbar spine include (a) an inflamed disc, (b) an inflamed nerve, (c) a hypervascular scar, (d) a hypertrophied superior articular process (SAP) and ligamentum flavum, (e) a tender capsule, (f) an impacting facet margin, (g) a superior foraminal facet osteophyte and cyst, (h) a superior foraminal ligament impingement, (i) a hidden shoulder osteophyte. The position of the key opinion authors of the perspective article is that further clinical research will continue to validate pain generator-based treatment protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis. The endoscopic technology platform enables spine surgeons to directly visualize pain generators, forming the basis for more simplified targeted surgical pain management therapies. Limitations of this care model are dictated by appropriate patient selection and mastering the learning curve of modern MIS procedures. Decompensated deformity and instability will likely continue to be treated with open corrective surgery. Vertically integrated outpatient spine care programs are the most suitable setting for executing such pain generator-focused programs.
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- pain management
- chronic pain
- robot assisted
- neuropathic pain
- coronary artery bypass
- healthcare
- quality improvement
- palliative care
- spinal cord
- public health
- magnetic resonance imaging
- computed tomography
- systematic review
- patients undergoing
- acute kidney injury
- high throughput
- single cell
- spinal cord injury
- total knee arthroplasty
- newly diagnosed
- cancer therapy
- deep learning
- affordable care act