Electronic Tools to Bridge the Language Gap in Health Care for People Who Have Migrated: Systematic Review.
Frédérique ThononSwati PerrotAbhijna Vithal YergolkarOlivia Rousset TorrenteJames W GriffithOlivier ChassanyMartin DuracinskyPublished in: Journal of medical Internet research (2021)
Overall, the apps had good levels of acceptability, though only half had their efficacy evaluated. In those evaluations, the endpoints were mostly related to reported behavior change and knowledge improvement, which is common for evaluations of health promotion programs. In the future, as more health apps are created, it is essential that apps that claim to have a public health objective undergo a rigorous evaluation of their acceptability, efficacy, and actual use. Indicators of outcomes beyond changes in behavior and knowledge should be reported; change in health status or access to care should also be reported. This systematic review has helped us note the characteristics associated with improved acceptability and efficacy, which can be helpful for the development of future apps.