Login / Signup

No functional differences in anatomic reconstruction with one vs. two suture anchors after non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps brachii tendon rupture: a case report and review of the literature.

Manuel WeißenbergerTizian HeinzKilian RuecklMaximilian RudertAlexander KlugReinhard HoffmannKay Schmidt-Horlohé
Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders (2020)
Anatomic reattachment of the distal biceps tendon is a successful operative treatment option for distal biceps tendon ruptures. Suture anchor fixation remains one of the most common techniques, as it allows fast surgery and provides good results with respect to range of motion (ROM) and functional scoring according to the current literature. However, the number of anchors required for a stable fixation remains unclear. As indicated by our presented case, we hypothesize, that there are no significant differences between a one-point or a two-point fixation. In the presented case report, no intraindividual differences between the usage of one versus two suture anchors were evident in the short-term follow-up.
Keyphrases
  • minimally invasive
  • rotator cuff
  • case report
  • anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  • systematic review
  • combination therapy
  • mass spectrometry
  • replacement therapy