Wide Variation in Methodology in Level I and II Studies on Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Review of Available Clinical Trials Comparing Patient Demographics, Treatment Means, and Outcomes Reporting.
Bryan Michael SaltzmanMichael L RedondoAdam BeerEric J CotterRachel M FrankAdam B YankeBrian J ColePublished in: Cartilage (2018)
Recently published studies and clinical trials evaluate a variety of cartilage repair and restoration strategies for the knee, most commonly MFX + augmentation, at various time points of outcome evaluation, with KOOS and VAS scores being used most commonly. MFX remains the most common comparison group for these therapeutic investigations. Most studies demonstrate superiority versus comparison or control groups. Understanding the nature of published and ongoing clinical trials will be helpful in the investigation of emerging technologies required to navigate the regulatory process while studying a relatively narrow population of patients.
Keyphrases
- clinical trial
- case control
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- phase ii
- ejection fraction
- total knee arthroplasty
- chronic kidney disease
- case report
- transcription factor
- type diabetes
- open label
- peritoneal dialysis
- extracellular matrix
- systematic review
- metabolic syndrome
- patient reported outcomes
- adipose tissue
- smoking cessation
- soft tissue
- replacement therapy