Login / Signup

Quantitative Account of the Bonding Properties of a Rubredoxin Model Complex [Fe(SCH3)4]q, q = -2, -1, +2, +3.

Demeter TzeliSimone RaugeiSotiris S Xantheas
Published in: Journal of chemical theory and computation (2021)
Iron-sulfur clusters play important roles in biology as parts of electron-transfer chains and catalytic cofactors. Here, we report a detailed computational analysis of a structural model of the simplest natural iron-sulfur cluster of rubredoxin and its cationic counterparts. Specifically, we investigated adiabatic reduction energies, dissociation energies, and bonding properties of the low-lying electronic states of the complexes [Fe(SCH3)4]2-/1-/2+/3+ using multireference (CASSCF, MRCISD), and coupled cluster [CCSD(T)] methodologies. We show that the nature of the Fe-S chemical bond and the magnitude of the ionization potentials in the anionic and cationic [Fe(SCH3)4] complexes offer a physical rationale for the relative stabilization, structure, and speciation of these complexes. Anionic and cationic complexes present different types of chemical bonds: prevalently ionic in [Fe(SCH3)4]2-/1- complexes and covalent in [Fe(SCH3)4]2+/3+ complexes. The ionic bonds result in an energy gain for the transition [Fe(SCH3)4]2- → [Fe(SCH3)4]- (i.e., FeII → FeIII) of 1.5 eV, while the covalent bonds result in an energy loss for the transition [Fe(SCH3)4]2+ → [Fe(SCH3)4]3+ of 16.6 eV, almost half of the ionization potential of Fe2+. The ionic versus covalent bond character influences the Fe-S bond strength and length, that is, ionic Fe-S bonds are longer than covalent ones by about 0.2 Å (for FeII) and 0.04 Å (for FeII). Finally, the average Fe-S heterolytic bond strength is 6.7 eV (FeII) and 14.6 eV (FeIII) at the RCCSD(T) level of theory.
Keyphrases
  • metal organic framework
  • electron transfer
  • high resolution
  • mental health
  • mass spectrometry
  • solid state
  • crystal structure