Transitioning from Methanol to Olefins (MTO) toward a Tandem CO 2 Hydrogenation Process: On the Role and Fate of Heteroatoms (Mg, Si) in MAPO-18 Zeotypes.
Tomás Cordero-LanzacIzar Capel BerdiellAlessia AiriSang-Ho ChungJenna L MancusoEvgeniy A RedekopClaudia FabrisLeidy Figueroa-QuinteroJuan Carlos Navarro de MiguelJavier NarcisoEnrique V Ramos-FernandezStian SvelleVeronique Van SpeybroeckJavier Ruiz-MartínezSilvia BordigaUnni OlsbyePublished in: JACS Au (2024)
The tandem CO 2 hydrogenation to hydrocarbons over mixed metal oxide/zeolite catalysts (OXZEO) is an efficient way of producing value-added hydrocarbons (platform chemicals and fuels) directly from CO 2 via methanol intermediate in a single reactor. In this contribution, two MAPO-18 zeotypes (M = Mg, Si) were tested and their performance was compared under methanol-to-olefins (MTO) conditions (350 °C, P CH 3 OH = 0.04 bar, 6.5 g CH 3 OH h -1 g -1 ), methanol/CO/H 2 cofeed conditions (350 °C, P CH 3 OH / P CO / P H 2 = 1:7.3:21.7 bar, 2.5 g CH 3 OH h -1 g -1 ), and tandem CO 2 hydrogenation-to-olefin conditions (350 °C, P CO 2 / P H 2 = 7.5:22.5 bar, 1.4-12.0 g MAPO-18 h mol CO 2 -1 ). In the latter case, the zeotypes were mixed with a fixed amount of ZnO:ZrO 2 catalyst, well-known for the conversion of CO 2 /H 2 to methanol. Focus was set on the methanol conversion activity, product selectivity, and performance stability with time-on-stream. In situ and ex situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), sorption experiments, and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) calculations were performed to correlate material performance with material characteristics. The catalytic tests demonstrated the better performance of MgAPO-18 versus SAPO-18 at MTO conditions, the much superior performance of MgAPO-18 under methanol/CO/H 2 cofeeds, and yet the increasingly similar performance of the two materials under tandem conditions upon increasing the zeotype-to-oxide ratio in the tandem catalyst bed. In situ FT-IR measurements coupled with AIMD calculations revealed differences in the MTO initiation mechanism between the two materials. SAPO-18 promoted initial CO 2 formation, indicative of a formaldehyde-based decarboxylation mechanism, while CO and ketene were the main constituents of the initiation pool in MgAPO-18, suggesting a decarbonylation mechanism. Under tandem CO 2 hydrogenation conditions, the presence of high water concentrations and low methanol partial pressure in the reaction medium led to lower, and increasingly similar, methanol turnover frequencies for the zeotypes. Despite both MAPO-18 zeotypes showing signs of activity loss upon storage due to the interaction of the sites with ambient humidity, they presented a remarkable stability after reaching steady state under tandem reaction conditions and after steaming and regeneration cycles at high temperatures. Water adsorption experiments at room temperature confirmed this observation. The faster activity loss observed in the Mg version is assigned to its harder Mg 2+ -ion character and the higher concentration of CHA defects in the AEI structure, identified by solid-state NMR and XRD. The low stability of a MgAPO-34 zeotype (CHA structure) upon storage corroborated the relationship between CHA defects and instability.