Login / Signup

Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2.

Anthony P WalkerMartin G De KauweAna BastosSoumaya BelmecheriKaterina GeorgiouRalph F KeelingSean M McMahonBelinda E MedlynDavid J P MooreRichard J NorbySönke ZaehleKristina J Anderson-TeixeiraGiovanna BattipagliaRoel J W BrienenKristine G CabugaoMaxime CailleretElliott CampbellJoseph G CanadellPhilippe CiaisMatthew E CraigDavid S EllsworthGraham D FarquharSimone FatichiJoshua B FisherDavid C FrankHeather D GravenLianhong GuVanessa HaverdKelly A HeilmanMartin HeimannBruce A HungateColleen M IversenFortunat JoosMingkai JiangTrevor F KeenanJürgen KnauerChristian KörnerVictor O LeshykSebastian LeuzingerYao LiuNatasha MacBeanYadvinder MalhiTim R McVicarJosep PenuelasJulia PongratzA Shafer PowellTerhi RiuttaManon E B SabotJuergen SchleucherStephen SitchWilliam Kolby SmithBenjamin N SulmanBenton N TaylorCésar TerrerMargaret S TornKathleen K TresederAnna T TrugmanSusan E TrumborePhillip J van MantgemSteven L VoelkerMary E WhelanPieter A Zuidema
Published in: The New phytologist (2020)
Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2 ]) is increasing, which increases leaf-scale photosynthesis and intrinsic water-use efficiency. These direct responses have the potential to increase plant growth, vegetation biomass, and soil organic matter; transferring carbon from the atmosphere into terrestrial ecosystems (a carbon sink). A substantial global terrestrial carbon sink would slow the rate of [CO2 ] increase and thus climate change. However, ecosystem CO2 responses are complex or confounded by concurrent changes in multiple agents of global change and evidence for a [CO2 ]-driven terrestrial carbon sink can appear contradictory. Here we synthesize theory and broad, multidisciplinary evidence for the effects of increasing [CO2 ] (iCO2 ) on the global terrestrial carbon sink. Evidence suggests a substantial increase in global photosynthesis since pre-industrial times. Established theory, supported by experiments, indicates that iCO2 is likely responsible for about half of the increase. Global carbon budgeting, atmospheric data, and forest inventories indicate a historical carbon sink, and these apparent iCO2 responses are high in comparison to experiments and predictions from theory. Plant mortality and soil carbon iCO2 responses are highly uncertain. In conclusion, a range of evidence supports a positive terrestrial carbon sink in response to iCO2 , albeit with uncertain magnitude and strong suggestion of a role for additional agents of global change.
Keyphrases
  • climate change
  • carbon dioxide
  • type diabetes
  • plant growth
  • magnetic resonance
  • cardiovascular disease
  • organic matter
  • cardiovascular events
  • electronic health record