Login / Signup

Particulate Oxalate-To-Sulfate Ratio as an Aqueous Processing Marker: Similarity Across Field Campaigns and Limitations.

Miguel Ricardo A HilarioEwan C CrosbiePaola Angela BañagaGrace BetitoRachel A BraunMaria Obiminda CambalizaAndrea F CorralMelliza Templonuevo CruzJack E DibbGenevieve Rose LorenzoAlexander B MacDonaldClaire E RobinsonMichael A ShookJames Bernard SimpasConnor StahlEdward L WinsteadLuke D ZiembaArmin Sorooshian
Published in: Geophysical research letters (2021)
Leveraging aerosol data from multiple airborne and surface-based field campaigns encompassing diverse environmental conditions, we calculate statistics of the oxalate-sulfate mass ratio (median: 0.0217; 95% confidence interval: 0.0154-0.0296; R = 0.76; N = 2,948). Ground-based measurements of the oxalate-sulfate ratio fall within our 95% confidence interval, suggesting the range is robust within the mixed layer for the submicrometer particle size range. We demonstrate that dust and biomass burning emissions can separately bias this ratio toward higher values by at least one order of magnitude. In the absence of these confounding factors, the 95% confidence interval of the ratio may be used to estimate the relative extent of aqueous processing by comparing inferred oxalate concentrations between air masses, with the assumption that sulfate primarily originates from aqueous processing.
Keyphrases
  • ionic liquid
  • electronic health record
  • machine learning
  • human health
  • magnetic resonance
  • climate change
  • air pollution
  • health risk