Is the association of electrochemotherapy and bone fixation rational in patients with bone metastasis?
Luca CevolaniLaura CampanacciEric Lodewijk StaalsBarbara DozzaGiuseppe BianchiFrancesca de TerlizziDavide Maria DonatiPublished in: Journal of surgical oncology (2023)
We found that pain levels decreased after treatment in 23 of the 29 cases for a pain relief rate of 79% at final follow-up. Pain is one of the most important indicators of quality of life in patients that undergo palliative treatments. Even if conventional external body radiotherapy is considered a noninvasive treatment, it presents a dose-dependent toxicity. ECT provides a chemical necrosis preserving osteogenic activity and structural integrity of bone trabeculae; this is a crucial difference with other local treatments and allows bone healing in case of pathological fracture. The risk of local progression in our patient population was small, and 44% experienced bone recovery while 53% of the cases remained unchanged. We observe intraoperative fracture in one case. This technique, in selected patients, improves outcome in bone metastatic patients combing both the efficacy of the ECT in the local control of the disease and the mechanical stability with the bone fixation to synergize their benefits. Moreover, the risk of complication is very low. Although encouraging data, comparative studies are required to quantify the real efficacy of the technique. Level of Evidence Level I, therapeutic study.
Keyphrases
- bone mineral density
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- chronic pain
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- soft tissue
- squamous cell carcinoma
- patient reported outcomes
- mesenchymal stem cells
- radiation therapy
- bone loss
- minimally invasive
- early stage
- body composition
- postoperative pain
- bone marrow
- artificial intelligence