Acute effects of resistance exercise with blood flow restriction on cardiovascular response: a meta-analysis.
Leonardo Kesrouani LemosCarlos Alberto Toledo Teixeira FilhoTaíse Mendes BiralAllysiê Priscilla de Souza CavinaEduardo Pizzo JuniorSilas de Oliveira DamascenoFranciele Marques VanderleiPublished in: Journal of comparative effectiveness research (2022)
Aim: To compare the acute effects of low-load resistance training associated with blood flow restriction (LLRT-BFR) with low-load resistance training (LLRT) and high-load resistance training (HLRT) on cardiovascular outcomes in healthy individuals. Methods: This review was registered and the studies were selected using seven databases. Randomized controlled clinical trials were included that evaluated LLRT-BFR compared with LLRT and HLRT in young individuals for the cardiovascular outcomes. Results: 19 studies were included. In the comparison of LLRT-BFR with HLRT, there were significant differences for cardiac output and heart rate - with reduced values and in favor of LLRT-BFR. Conclusion: There are no greater acute effects of the addition of blood flow restriction, with the exception of the reduction in cardiac output and heart rate for LLRT-BFR compared with HLRT.
Keyphrases
- resistance training
- blood flow
- heart rate
- body composition
- high intensity
- heart rate variability
- liver failure
- blood pressure
- respiratory failure
- clinical trial
- aortic dissection
- drug induced
- left ventricular
- open label
- double blind
- case control
- hepatitis b virus
- phase ii
- machine learning
- phase iii
- heart failure
- placebo controlled
- artificial intelligence
- big data
- study protocol