Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low and intermediate risk: A risk specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Fang FangJingjing TangYaqin ZhaoJialing HePing XuAndrew FaramandPublished in: PloS one (2019)
For patients with severe aortic stenosis who were at low risk for death from surgery, TAVI achieved superior clinical outcomes compared to SAVR; however, these benefits were not seen in those with intermediate risk. This information may inform discussions about deciding between SAVR and TAVI for patients with low to intermediate risk separately.
Keyphrases
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- aortic stenosis
- aortic valve replacement
- ejection fraction
- aortic valve
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- left ventricular
- end stage renal disease
- coronary artery disease
- systematic review
- healthcare
- chronic kidney disease
- heart failure
- newly diagnosed
- prognostic factors
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- acute coronary syndrome
- minimally invasive
- patient reported