Derivatives of Ribosome-Inhibiting Antibiotic Chloramphenicol Inhibit the Biosynthesis of Bacterial Cell Wall.
Sivan Louzoun ZadaKeith D GreenSanjib K ShresthaIdo M HerzogSylvie Garneau-TsodikovaMicha FridmanPublished in: ACS infectious diseases (2018)
Here, we describe the preparation and evaluation of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl derivatives of the bacterial translation inhibiting antibiotic chloramphenicol (CAM). Compared to the parent antibiotic, two compounds containing α,β-unsaturated ketones (1 and 4) displayed a broader spectrum of activity against a panel of Gram-positive pathogens with a minimum inhibitory concentration range of 2-32 μg/mL. Interestingly, unlike the parent CAM, these compounds do not inhibit bacterial translation. Microscopic evidence and metabolic labeling of a cell wall peptidoglycan suggested that compounds 1 and 4 caused extensive damage to the envelope of Staphylococcus aureus cells by inhibition of the early stage of cell wall peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Unlike the effect of membrane-disrupting antimicrobial cationic amphiphiles, these compounds did not rapidly permeabilize the bacterial membrane. Like the parent antibiotic CAM, compounds 1 and 4 had a bacteriostatic effect on S. aureus. Both compounds 1 and 4 were cytotoxic to immortalized nucleated mammalian cells; however, neither caused measurable membrane damage to mammalian red blood cells. These data suggest that the reported CAM-derived antimicrobial agents offer a new molecular scaffold for development of novel bacterial cell wall biosynthesis inhibiting antibiotics.
Keyphrases
- cell wall
- staphylococcus aureus
- early stage
- signaling pathway
- red blood cell
- oxidative stress
- induced apoptosis
- escherichia coli
- electronic health record
- machine learning
- biofilm formation
- methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus
- endoplasmic reticulum stress
- cystic fibrosis
- high resolution
- lymph node
- big data
- cell proliferation
- cord blood
- candida albicans
- structure activity relationship
- tissue engineering