Viewpoint on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Medical Care Retention Guidelines in the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic Era and Beyond: Lessons Learned From Electronic Health Record Screening and Outreach.
Ethan MoitraPaola C Jiménez MuñozMartha C SanchezMegan M PinkstonPublished in: Open forum infectious diseases (2024)
In this viewpoint, we discuss retention in care for people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and call into question the methodology used to characterize retention, as well as the definitions themselves. Optimal retention for people with HIV (PWH) is defined in multiple ways by major healthcare leaders in the United States, typically focusing on appointment attendance or laboratory work. Yet, these definitions rely on in-person encounters, an approach to care that is becoming less common due to the rise of telehealth visits, particularly in light of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Our recent work showed that relying on electronic health records to identify PWH who were not retained in care not only failed to capture the nuances of modern HIV medical treatment engagement, but also led to misidentification of patients' retention status due to limitations in the record system. As such, we recommend a reevaluation of how HIV medical care retention is defined and reported.
Keyphrases
- human immunodeficiency virus
- antiretroviral therapy
- electronic health record
- healthcare
- hepatitis c virus
- coronavirus disease
- hiv infected
- hiv positive
- hiv aids
- sars cov
- clinical decision support
- hiv testing
- palliative care
- quality improvement
- end stage renal disease
- adverse drug
- ejection fraction
- men who have sex with men
- newly diagnosed
- affordable care act
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- chronic pain
- health insurance
- health information