Login / Signup

The "sacral parasympathetic": ontogeny and anatomy of a myth.

Isabel Espinosa-MedinaOrthis SahaFranck BoismoreauJean-François Brunet
Published in: Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society (2017)
We recently defined genetic traits that distinguish sympathetic from parasympathetic neurons, both preganglionic and ganglionic (Espinosa-Medina et al., Science 354:893-897, 2016). By this set of criteria, we found that the sacral autonomic outflow is sympathetic, not parasympathetic as has been thought for more than a century. Proposing such a belated shift in perspective begs the question why the new criterion (cell types defined by their genetic make-up and dependencies) should be favored over the anatomical, physiological and pharmacological considerations of long ago that inspired the "parasympathetic" classification. After a brief reminder of the former, we expound the weaknesses of the latter and argue that the novel genetic definition helps integrating neglected anatomical and physiological observations and clearing the path for future research.
Keyphrases
  • heart rate variability
  • genome wide
  • heart rate
  • copy number
  • machine learning
  • single cell
  • spinal cord
  • dna methylation
  • cell therapy
  • gene expression
  • current status
  • blood pressure
  • spinal cord injury
  • bone marrow