Login / Signup

Application of the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Methodology to a Large Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Group Evaluating the Validity and Feasibility of Patient-Centered Standards in Geriatric Surgery.

Julia R BerianTracey L BakerRonnie A RosenthalJoAnn ColemanEmily FinlaysonMark R KatlicSandhya A Lagoo-DeenadayalanVictoria L TangThomas N RobinsonClifford Y KoMarcia M Russell
Published in: Health services research (2018)
There are differences in validity and feasibility ratings by health professions, with surgeons rating standards more critically than nonsurgeons. However, three separate discussion subgroups rated a high proportion (96-100 percent) of standards as valid, indicating the RAM can be successfully applied to a large stakeholder group.
Keyphrases
  • minimally invasive
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • quality improvement
  • coronary artery bypass
  • mental health
  • climate change
  • psychometric properties
  • percutaneous coronary intervention