New Equations for Hydrostatic Weighing without Head Submersion.
Jeff C TeschPanayiotis PapadopoulosForrest DolgenerGrant M TinsleyPublished in: Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology (2022)
New equations were derived to predict the density of the body (DB) by hydrostatic weighing with the head above water (HW HAW ). Hydrostatic weighing with the head below water (HW HBW ) was the criterion for DB measurement in 90 subjects (44 M, 46 F). Head volume by immersion (HV IMM ) was determined by subtracting the mass in water with the head below water (MW HBW ) from the mass in water with the head above water (MW HAW ), with subjects at residual lung volume. Equations were derived for head volume prediction (HV PRED ) from head measurements and used to correct DB by HW HAW . Equations were also derived for HW HAW using direct regression of DB from uncorrected density (with MW HAW in place of MW HBW ). Prediction equations were validated in 45 additional subjects (21 M, 24 F). Results were evaluated using equivalence testing, linear regression, Bland-Altman plots, and paired t -tests. Head girth, face girth, and body mass produced the smallest errors for HV PRED . In both M and F validation groups, equivalence (±2% fat by weight) was demonstrated between body fat percent (BF%) by HW HBW and BF% by HW HAW with HV PRED . Variance in computer-averaged samples of MW HAW was significantly less ( p < 0.05) than MW HBW . Prediction error was smaller for BF% by HW HAW with HV PRED than for alternative methods. Conclusions: Equivalence between BF% by HW HBW and BF% by HW HAW with HV PRED was demonstrated and differences were not statistically significant. Weight fluctuations were smaller for HW HAW than HW HBW .