Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chenyang WangSheng LiuRaimov KamronbekSiyao NiYunjiu ChengHuiyuan YanMing ZhangPublished in: Journal of interventional cardiology (2023)
In the present meta-analysis comparing PCI and CABG in patients with chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries, the results indicated that PCI was superior to CABG in reducing all-cause mortality and cardiac death but inferior in decreasing myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. There was no statistically significant difference in MACE between the two groups.
Keyphrases
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- coronary artery disease
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- systematic review
- acute myocardial infarction
- antiplatelet therapy
- left ventricular
- acute coronary syndrome
- coronary artery
- coronary artery bypass
- heart failure
- aortic stenosis
- meta analyses
- atrial fibrillation